WorldRisk

Which passport do you hold?

Risk to a traveller depends on their nationality. A country that sanctions your destination, or is sanctioned by it, changes how you are treated on arrival. Choosing here adjusts every score on the site.

We hold travel advice written for four nationalities so far. Selecting anything else shows the neutral baseline, and every page says so where it applies rather than presenting it as an assessment made for you.

Kept in your browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere, and you can change it at any time from the header.

All countries

Türkiye

65High65 of 100, High band, 50 to 74good confidence(7/7 dimensions)
What this score means
Extreme75 to 100
Severe and systematic. Device search, interception and detention over online activity are documented rather than theoretical. Reconsider what you carry and what you say.
High50 to 74
Substantial and consistently evidenced measures. Device inspection, monitored networks or restricted services should be expected rather than treated as unlikely.
Caution25 to 49
Some risk, and manageable with precautions. Measures are evidenced but are narrow, inconsistently applied, or the picture is mixed.
Low0 to 24
Ordinary precautions. No systematic device search, network restriction or prosecution of visitors for online speech is evidenced.

Government travel advice is written for one citizenry, so the same country carries a different assessment depending on your passport. Change it in the header.

Showing the baseline, which weights every issuer equally. No government in our corpus publishes travel advice written for you, so this is not addressed to you specifically.

Dimensions

Each dimension is scored independently, because the traveller who cares about legal exposure for what they have posted is often not the one carrying client data. Higher means more risk.

Surveillance and interception

How comprehensively are communications intercepted, retained, and monitored, and is commercial spyware in use?

87Extreme87 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence7 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 65% of full strength.

Why this score (8 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored TUR 1 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored TUR 1.41 of 4 on how comprehensively the government monitors social media and private online communication, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored TUR 1.09 of 4 on how far privacy protection law shields communications from government access, where higher is freer. This measures what privacy law permits rather than what monitoring is practised, so it is read here as a constraint on interception rather than a measurement of it.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • The World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025 scored TUR 0.24 of 1 on whether freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy is effectively guaranteed, a measure built from expert assessments of warrantless interception of communications.

    World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6 · observed 2025-01-01

  • In Turkey, the issue recently hit the headlines when Justice Minister Akın Gürlek announced an agreement with platforms such as X, Instagram and TikTok, under which unverified accounts will be shut down after a three-month transition period.

    Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search · observed 2026-04-10 · extracted by language model

  • 1 Article 51/2 of the Electronic Communications Law states that electronic communications are private and cannot be listened to, recorded, stored, intercepted or tracked unless it is required by legislation or a court order.

    ARTICLE 19, via a site scoped search · observed 2023-04-21 · extracted by language model

  • Moreover, it has spyware functionality, such as capabilities to collect SMS messages, a list of installed apps on the device and device filesystem information.

    Kaspersky Securelist feed · observed 2025-12-15 · extracted by language model

  • 過去には、政治団体事務所を訪問した日本人旅行者が当局から監視された事例があります。

    Our translation: In the past, there was a case in which a Japanese traveller who visited a political organisation's office was monitored by the authorities.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Overseas travel safety information · observed 2026-10-16 · written for JPN nationals · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

2 excluded sources
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2023-10-04: aged out after 3 years.
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-05-03: aged out after 2 years.

Speech and legal exposure

What legal risk attaches to what I have said online, or say while I am there?

81Extreme81 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence12 independent sources

Why this score (18 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

2 excluded sources
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-03-15: aged out after 3 years.
  • ARTICLE 19, via a site scoped search, observed 2023-04-13: aged out after 4 years.

Data jurisdiction

What happens to corporate or client data I carry into the jurisdiction?

69High69 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

moderate confidence1 independent source

Why this score (1 source)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Network threat

How hostile is the network environment to a foreign visitor, from state actors and criminals alike?

68High68 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence6 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 66% of full strength.

Why this score (6 sources)
  • ITU Global Cybersecurity Index 2024, Technical pillar: 20.00 of 20.

    International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index · observed 2024-12-31

  • Freedom House scored Turkey 13 of 25 on obstacles to access in Freedom on the Net, a category covering state control over internet infrastructure and gateways, regulatory and ownership control over service providers, and the independence of the regulator.

    Freedom House, Freedom on the Net, obstacles to access · observed 2025-01-01

  • In Serbia, a leak affected about 600,000 Telekom Srbija users, and in Turkey, another leak exposing data from around 300,000 Turkcell users left hundreds of thousands vulnerable to identity theft and financial fraud.

    Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search · observed 2026-07-09 · extracted by language model

  • In August 2025, we discovered a campaign targeting individuals in Turkey with a new Android banking Trojan we dubbed “Frogblight”.

    Kaspersky Securelist feed · observed 2025-12-15 · extracted by language model

  • 上記のほか、トルコでも他国同様、置引き、スリ、ひったくり等の窃盗事件、金品強奪等の強盗事件、クレジットカードのスキミングによる財産被害等の邦人の犯罪被害が報告されています。

    Our translation: In addition to the above, as in other countries, cases of crime affecting Japanese nationals in Turkey, including theft such as unattended-item theft, pickpocketing and snatch theft, robbery involving the seizure of money and valuables, and property damage caused by credit-card skimming, have been reported.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Overseas travel safety information · observed 2026-10-16 · written for JPN nationals · extracted by language model

  • The law also establishes a new cybersecurity authority and cybersecurity commission, which have legal access to any kind of digital information stored in Turkey when approved by a court order.

    Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search · observed 2025-03-13 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

4 excluded sources
  • SMEX, via a site scoped search, observed 2024-08-23: aged out after 2 years.
  • Global Voices (Advox), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-08-02: aged out after 2 years.
  • Citizen Lab feed, observed 2024-09-06: aged out after 2 years.
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-03-08: aged out after 3 years.

Connectivity continuity

How likely am I to lose access to the internet, or to the specific tools I depend on?

53High53 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence13 independent sources

Why this score (26 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

10 excluded sources
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-10-09: aged out after 2 years.
  • SMEX, via a site scoped search, observed 2024-08-23: aged out after 2 years.
  • Global Voices (Advox), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-08-15: aged out after 2 years.
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-08-06: aged out after 2 years.
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-08-02: aged out after 2 years.
  • ARTICLE 19, via a site scoped search, observed 2023-03-03: aged out after 4 years.
  • Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-03-15: aged out after 3 years.
  • Global Voices (Advox), via a site scoped search, observed 2023-12-26: aged out after 3 years.
  • Global Voices (Advox), via a site scoped search, observed 2024-08-02: aged out after 2 years.
  • Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search, observed 2023-08-30: aged out after 3 years.

Encryption and VPN legality

Are VPNs and strong encryption lawful, and can I be required to install an application or hand over keys?

51High51 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence5 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 54% of full strength.

Why this score (5 sources)
  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored TUR 1.25 of 4 on whether the government regulates the internet in a way consistent with international human rights standards, where higher is freer. This does not establish whether encryption or VPN use is lawful. It measures internet regulation in general, and is used as indirect evidence because the only survey that reads encryption law directly was published in 2019.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • OONI confirmed blocking on 723 of 89,269 measurements of anonymity and censorship circumvention tools in TUR over the 90 days to 2026-10-16, a confirmed blocking rate of 0.81 percent, with 10,661 further results inconclusive.

    Open Observatory of Network Interference, OONI measurement data · observed 2026-10-16

  • In December 2023 , the government also imposed an access ban on 16 VPN providers.

    Global Voices (Advox), via a site scoped search · observed 2024-08-15 · extracted by language model

  • There, the court condemned the use of evidence from the encrypted messaging app ByLock – and the Turkish courts’ expansive and unforeseeable interpretation of terrorism membership as creating an almost automatic presumption of guilt.

    Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search · observed 2026-05-07 · extracted by language model

  • Bu halde uçtan uca şifreleme sunan platformlar, kanunun getirdiği şartlara uymalarının teknik olarak imkansız olması nedeniyle kanuna uymamaları sonucunda uygulanacak yaptırımlar neticesinde Türkiye’de erişilemez hale gelebilecektir.

    Our translation: In this case, platforms offering end-to-end encryption may become inaccessible in Türkiye as a result of sanctions imposed for not complying with the law because it is technically impossible for them to comply with the conditions introduced by the law.

    ARTICLE 19, via a site scoped search · observed 2023-04-21 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

1 excluded source
  • Global Voices (Advox), via a site scoped search, observed 2023-12-26: aged out after 3 years.

Border device risk

How likely is my device to be searched, imaged, or seized at the border, and can I be compelled to unlock it?

38Caution38 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

moderate confidence5 independent sources

No reports were found of devices being searched, imaged or seized at this border, or of travellers being compelled to unlock them. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.

What the score rests on (5 indirect sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Trend

02550751002026-08-162026-10-16

The overall score is down 0.2 points over 61 days, from 64.8 to 64.6. Most movement is the event overlay decaying rather than anything happening: a news signal loses half its weight every three weeks, so a score drifts back toward its structural baseline on its own. A step that holds is the one worth reading.

Check this yourself

These are not inputs to the score for Türkiye. They are where to look if you want to test what is above against something we did not use.

Sources

This assessment draws on 22 sources: ARTICLE 19, via a site scoped search; Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise; Balkan Insight (BIRN), via a site scoped search; Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search; Electronic Frontier Foundation feed; Freedom House, Freedom in the World; Freedom House, Freedom on the Net, obstacles to access; Georgia Tech Internet Intelligence Lab, Internet Outage Detection and Analysis; Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories; Global Voices (Advox), via a site scoped search; Index on Censorship, via a site scoped search; International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index; Kaspersky Securelist feed; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Overseas travel safety information; Multiple, via Google News, Google News search results; MyJoyOnline, via a site scoped search; Open Observatory of Network Interference, OONI measurement data; The GDELT Project, GDELT Global Knowledge Graph 2.1; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice; US Department of State, Travel Advisories; V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project; World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6. Every contributing claim is quoted with its origin and date above. Model version 0.12.0, computed 2026-10-16.

If something here is wrong, say so. Corrections are handled in public, and we correct because the evidence is wrong, not because someone objects.