WorldRisk

Which passport do you hold?

Risk to a traveller depends on their nationality. A country that sanctions your destination, or is sanctioned by it, changes how you are treated on arrival. Choosing here adjusts every score on the site.

We hold travel advice written for four nationalities so far. Selecting anything else shows the neutral baseline, and every page says so where it applies rather than presenting it as an assessment made for you.

Kept in your browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere, and you can change it at any time from the header.

All countries

North Korea

93Extreme93 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100moderate confidence(5/7 dimensions)
What this score means
Extreme75 to 100
Severe and systematic. Device search, interception and detention over online activity are documented rather than theoretical. Reconsider what you carry and what you say.
High50 to 74
Substantial and consistently evidenced measures. Device inspection, monitored networks or restricted services should be expected rather than treated as unlikely.
Caution25 to 49
Some risk, and manageable with precautions. Measures are evidenced but are narrow, inconsistently applied, or the picture is mixed.
Low0 to 24
Ordinary precautions. No systematic device search, network restriction or prosecution of visitors for online speech is evidenced.

Government travel advice is written for one citizenry, so the same country carries a different assessment depending on your passport. Change it in the header.

Showing the baseline, which weights every issuer equally. No government in our corpus publishes travel advice written for you, so this is not addressed to you specifically.

Dimensions

Each dimension is scored independently, because the traveller who cares about legal exposure for what they have posted is often not the one carrying client data. Higher means more risk.

Speech and legal exposure

What legal risk attaches to what I have said online, or say while I am there?

100Extreme100 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence7 independent sources

Why this score (13 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored PRK 0 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • Freedom House 2026 scored PRK 0 of 4 on free and independent media.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored PRK 0.52 of 4 on how routinely the government censors political content on social media, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored PRK 0.15 of 4 on how often people are arrested for political content they posted online, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • North Korea - Level 4: Do Not Travel

    US Department of State, Travel Advisories · observed 2025-04-29 · written for USA nationals

  • FCDO advice for North Korea: avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_whole_country.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2025-12-10 · written for GBR nationals

  • North Korea: Avoid all travel

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-15 · written for CAN nationals

  • North Korea (Demokratische Volksrepublik Korea (Nordkorea)): No travel warning in force

    Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise · observed 2023-12-05 · written for DEU nationals

  • In the same month, four unemployed young men in Sinuiju, North Pyongan province, were sentenced to labour training after North Korean authorities caught them watching South Korean and Chinese films and dramas during a surprise inspection of a private home.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-15 · extracted by language model

  • The prohibition extends beyond South Korean entertainment content such as dramas, films and music to include any mention of South Korean society or the daily lives of South Korean people.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-15 · extracted by language model

  • You could face imprisonment for remarks considered to be critical of the state and its leadership.

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-16 · written for CAN nationals · extracted by language model

  • The new law mandates between five and fifteen years of forced labour for watching or possessing South Korean dramas, films or music and prescribes heavy sentences including the death penalty for the distribution of “large amounts” of content or for organising group viewings.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-05-14 · extracted by language model

  • The judge sentenced the man to 12 years and four months in prison for “deliberate, repeated and aggravated criminal acts” under the Criminal Procedure Act and the Reactionary Ideology and Culture Exclusion Act.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-05-14 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Connectivity continuity

How likely am I to lose access to the internet, or to the specific tools I depend on?

100Extreme100 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence7 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 62% of full strength.

Why this score (45 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Surveillance and interception

How comprehensively are communications intercepted, retained, and monitored, and is commercial spyware in use?

97Extreme97 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence4 independent sources

Why this score (7 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored PRK 0 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored PRK 0.14 of 4 on how comprehensively the government monitors social media and private online communication, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • In June 2026, it was reported that the authorities in North Pyongan province had sharply intensified phone surveillance, intercepting both landline and mobile calls to crack down on traders conducting business across provincial boundaries.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-15 · extracted by language model

  • You have no right to privacy. Your movements and communications may be under surveillance at any time. Your personal belongings may be searched, and authorities may review the contents stored on your electronic devices.

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-16 · written for CAN nationals · extracted by language model

  • Phone surveillance was ramped up in North Pyongan province while DVD owners are being forced to register their devices with the state.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-15 · extracted by language model

  • The centres are linking each user’s personal information with device data to build an integrated management system.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-15 · extracted by language model

  • The surveillance of the population has become even more pervasive, aided by advances in technology.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-14 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Encryption and VPN legality

Are VPNs and strong encryption lawful, and can I be required to install an application or hand over keys?

85Extreme85 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence2 independent sources

Why this score (2 sources)
  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored PRK 0.10 of 4 on whether the government regulates the internet in a way consistent with international human rights standards, where higher is freer. This does not establish whether encryption or VPN use is lawful. It measures internet regulation in general, and is used as indirect evidence because the only survey that reads encryption law directly was published in 2019.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • Die Nutzung eines VPN-Netzwerks ist verboten.

    Our translation: The use of a VPN network is prohibited.

    Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise · observed 2026-10-16 · written for DEU nationals · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Border device risk

How likely is my device to be searched, imaged, or seized at the border, and can I be compelled to unlock it?

81Extreme81 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence5 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 65% of full strength.

Why this score (6 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Network threat

How hostile is the network environment to a foreign visitor, from state actors and criminals alike?

Not assessed

Incidents have been reported for this dimension, but no source establishes a baseline for it, so there is nothing for them to adjust and no score is published. That is a gap in our evidence, not a finding that the risk is low.

Data jurisdiction

What happens to corporate or client data I carry into the jurisdiction?

Not assessed

No source currently covers this dimension for this country. That is a gap in our evidence, not a finding that the risk is low.

Trend

02550751002026-08-162026-10-16

The overall score is up 2.5 points over 61 days, from 90.4 to 92.9. Most movement is the event overlay decaying rather than anything happening: a news signal loses half its weight every three weeks, so a score drifts back toward its structural baseline on its own. A step that holds is the one worth reading.

Check this yourself

These are not inputs to the score for North Korea. They are where to look if you want to test what is above against something we did not use.

Sources

This assessment draws on 8 sources: Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise; CIVICUS Monitor country updates; Freedom House, Freedom in the World; Georgia Tech Internet Intelligence Lab, Internet Outage Detection and Analysis; Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice; US Department of State, Travel Advisories; V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project. Every contributing claim is quoted with its origin and date above. Model version 0.12.0, computed 2026-10-16.

If something here is wrong, say so. Corrections are handled in public, and we correct because the evidence is wrong, not because someone objects.