Mayotte
MayotteWhat this score means
- Extreme75 to 100
- Severe and systematic. Device search, interception and detention over online activity are documented rather than theoretical. Reconsider what you carry and what you say.
- High50 to 74
- Substantial and consistently evidenced measures. Device inspection, monitored networks or restricted services should be expected rather than treated as unlikely.
- Caution25 to 49
- Some risk, and manageable with precautions. Measures are evidenced but are narrow, inconsistently applied, or the picture is mixed.
- Low0 to 24
- Ordinary precautions. No systematic device search, network restriction or prosecution of visitors for online speech is evidenced.
Government travel advice is written for one citizenry, so the same country carries a different assessment depending on your passport. Change it in the header.
Showing the baseline, which weights every issuer equally. No government in our corpus publishes travel advice written for you, so this is not addressed to you specifically.
For United Kingdom nationals: 18 (low). This leans on advice written for British nationals, and weights other issuers lower.
For Europe nationals: 23 (low). This leans on advice written for German nationals, and weights other issuers lower.
For United States nationals: 23 (low). This leans on advice written for US nationals, and weights other issuers lower.
For Canada nationals: 24 (low). This leans on advice written for Canadian nationals, and weights other issuers lower.
For Latin America and the Caribbean nationals: 23 (low). No government in our corpus writes travel advice for Latin America and the Caribbean, so this starts from the neutral baseline and is then adjusted for the relationship below.
For Africa nationals: 23 (low). No government in our corpus writes travel advice for Africa, so this starts from the neutral baseline and is then adjusted for the relationship below.
For Middle East nationals: 23 (low). No government in our corpus writes travel advice for Middle East, so this starts from the neutral baseline and is then adjusted for the relationship below.
For South Asia nationals: 23 (low). No government in our corpus writes travel advice for South Asia, so this starts from the neutral baseline and is then adjusted for the relationship below.
For East and South East Asia nationals: 23 (low). No government in our corpus writes travel advice for East and South East Asia, so this starts from the neutral baseline and is then adjusted for the relationship below.
For Oceania nationals: 23 (low). No government in our corpus writes travel advice for Oceania, so this starts from the neutral baseline and is then adjusted for the relationship below.
Treat this as a prompt to research further, not a finding. This assessment rests on limited or ageing evidence. Read the sources on each dimension below and judge them yourself.
Dimensions
Each dimension is scored independently, because the traveller who cares about legal exposure for what they have posted is often not the one carrying client data. Higher means more risk.
Connectivity continuity
How likely am I to lose access to the internet, or to the specific tools I depend on?
good confidence2 independent sources
No shutdowns, throttling or platform blocks were found affecting connectivity here. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.
What the score rests on (2 contextual sources)
FCDO advice for Mayotte: no advisory against travel in force.
UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2025-12-10 · written for GBR nationals
Mayotte: Exercise a high degree of caution
Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-09 · written for CAN nationals
Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).
Border device risk
How likely is my device to be searched, imaged, or seized at the border, and can I be compelled to unlock it?
good confidence2 independent sources
No reports were found of devices being searched, imaged or seized at this border, or of travellers being compelled to unlock them. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.
What the score rests on (2 contextual sources)
FCDO advice for Mayotte: no advisory against travel in force.
UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2025-12-10 · written for GBR nationals
Mayotte: Exercise a high degree of caution
Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-09 · written for CAN nationals
Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).
Speech and legal exposure
What legal risk attaches to what I have said online, or say while I am there?
good confidence2 independent sources
No prosecutions or legal threats were found over what somebody published or said online here. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.
What the score rests on (2 contextual sources)
FCDO advice for Mayotte: no advisory against travel in force.
UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2025-12-10 · written for GBR nationals
Mayotte: Exercise a high degree of caution
Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-09 · written for CAN nationals
Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).
Surveillance and interception
How comprehensively are communications intercepted, retained, and monitored, and is commercial spyware in use?
No source currently covers this dimension for this country. That is a gap in our evidence, not a finding that the risk is low.
Encryption and VPN legality
Are VPNs and strong encryption lawful, and can I be required to install an application or hand over keys?
No source currently covers this dimension for this country. That is a gap in our evidence, not a finding that the risk is low.
Network threat
How hostile is the network environment to a foreign visitor, from state actors and criminals alike?
No source currently covers this dimension for this country. That is a gap in our evidence, not a finding that the risk is low.
Data jurisdiction
What happens to corporate or client data I carry into the jurisdiction?
No source currently covers this dimension for this country. That is a gap in our evidence, not a finding that the risk is low.
Trend
The overall score is up 0.5 points over 61 days, from 22.3 to 22.8. Most movement is the event overlay decaying rather than anything happening: a news signal loses half its weight every three weeks, so a score drifts back toward its structural baseline on its own. A step that holds is the one worth reading.
Check this yourself
These are not inputs to the score for Mayotte. They are where to look if you want to test what is above against something we did not use.
- OONI ExplorerMeasured tests of website and app blocking, updated continuously by volunteers running probes in country. Not used in our scores: its licence forbids commercial use.
- IODA outage recordThe full outage history behind any continuity events shown above, including the measurement methods that detected them.
- FCDO travel adviceThe UK government view, written for UK nationals.
- US State Department travel advisoriesThe US government view, written for US nationals.
Sources
This assessment draws on 2 sources: Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice. Every contributing claim is quoted with its origin and date above. Model version 0.12.0, computed 2026-10-16.
If something here is wrong, say so. Corrections are handled in public, and we correct because the evidence is wrong, not because someone objects.