WorldRisk

Which passport do you hold?

Risk to a traveller depends on their nationality. A country that sanctions your destination, or is sanctioned by it, changes how you are treated on arrival. Choosing here adjusts every score on the site.

We hold travel advice written for four nationalities so far. Selecting anything else shows the neutral baseline, and every page says so where it applies rather than presenting it as an assessment made for you.

Kept in your browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere, and you can change it at any time from the header.

All countries

Kazakhstan

60High60 of 100, High band, 50 to 74good confidence(7/7 dimensions)
What this score means
Extreme75 to 100
Severe and systematic. Device search, interception and detention over online activity are documented rather than theoretical. Reconsider what you carry and what you say.
High50 to 74
Substantial and consistently evidenced measures. Device inspection, monitored networks or restricted services should be expected rather than treated as unlikely.
Caution25 to 49
Some risk, and manageable with precautions. Measures are evidenced but are narrow, inconsistently applied, or the picture is mixed.
Low0 to 24
Ordinary precautions. No systematic device search, network restriction or prosecution of visitors for online speech is evidenced.

Government travel advice is written for one citizenry, so the same country carries a different assessment depending on your passport. Change it in the header.

Showing the baseline, which weights every issuer equally. No government in our corpus publishes travel advice written for you, so this is not addressed to you specifically.

Dimensions

Each dimension is scored independently, because the traveller who cares about legal exposure for what they have posted is often not the one carrying client data. Higher means more risk.

Speech and legal exposure

What legal risk attaches to what I have said online, or say while I am there?

86Extreme86 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence9 independent sources

Why this score (20 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored KAZ 1 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • Freedom House 2026 scored KAZ 0 of 4 on free and independent media.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored KAZ 2.31 of 4 on how routinely the government censors political content on social media, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored KAZ 0.58 of 4 on how often people are arrested for political content they posted online, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • Kazakhstan - Level 1: Exercise Normal Precautions

    US Department of State, Travel Advisories · observed 2026-08-18 · written for USA nationals

  • FCDO advice for Kazakhstan: no advisory against travel in force.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2026-10-13 · written for GBR nationals

  • Kazakhstan: Take normal security precautions

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-15 · written for CAN nationals

  • Kazakhstan (Kasachstan): No travel warning in force

    Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise · observed 2026-02-27 · written for DEU nationals

  • It's illegal to post images or comments on social media that show disrespect towards religion, culture or national symbols.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2026-03-30

  • Moreover, the broadly worded Criminal Code provision on the dissemination of “false information” was increasingly used against journalists, bloggers and civic activists.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-07-23 · extracted by language model

  • As the trial in the case was approaching, several people taking part in a social media campaign in support of the activists were detained, intimidated and forced by police to delete their posts.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

  • New accreditation rules introduced in 2024 grant authorities broad powers to deny or revoke accreditation for foreign media and journalists.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

  • Authorities accused Bazhkenova of “repeated and deliberate distribution of knowingly false information” and ordered her to be placed under house arrest for two months pending investigation.

    Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search · observed 2025-12-02 · extracted by language model

  • Sharing or publishing images that the authorities consider to be insulting risks a fine or a prison sentence.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2026-10-13 · written for GBR nationals · extracted by language model

  • In May 2026, opposition activist Marat Zhanuzakov was detained in Astana after publishing a post highly critical of Russian President Vladimir Putin and expressing support for Ukraine on the day of Putin’s state visit to Kazakhstan.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-07-23 · extracted by language model

  • The charges concerned a Facebook post in which she called on the relatives and supporters of prominent opposition activist Marat Zhylanbayev to gather outside the prison where he is held and seek a meeting with him in order to prevent him from facing the same fate as other political prisoners who have died behind bars.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-07-23 · extracted by language model

  • Following a law enforcement raid on the offices of Orda.kz and the detention of its staff at the beginning of December 2025, editor-in-chief Gulnara Bazhkenova was placed under house arrest pending investigation on charges of knowingly spreading “false” information – a broadly worded offence open to abuse.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

  • Several other individuals who posted similar photos were reportedly summoned, threatened and asked to delete the posts by police.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

  • In April 2025, authorities detained and interrogated him in connection with a criminal false information investigation into another social media post on the same topic.

    Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search · observed 2026-08-05 · extracted by language model

  • The amendments, more commonly known as the “anti-LGBT propaganda” legislation, will restrict media figures, educators, and social media users from writing, lecturing, or posting propaganda relating to “pedophilia and/or non-traditonal sexual orientations.”

    Vlast, via a site scoped search · observed 2025-12-04 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Network threat

How hostile is the network environment to a foreign visitor, from state actors and criminals alike?

72High72 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence6 independent sources

Why this score (7 sources)
  • ITU Global Cybersecurity Index 2024, Technical pillar: 19.38 of 20.

    International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index · observed 2024-12-31

  • Freedom House scored Kazakhstan 14 of 25 on obstacles to access in Freedom on the Net, a category covering state control over internet infrastructure and gateways, regulatory and ownership control over service providers, and the independence of the regulator.

    Freedom House, Freedom on the Net, obstacles to access · observed 2025-01-01

  • Cybercrime occurs frequently in Kazakhstan, especially online extortion and identity theft.

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-16 · written for CAN nationals · extracted by language model

  • Several independent news websites were targeted by cyberattacks during the constitutional reform campaign, while the websites of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) became inaccessible across Kazakhstan shortly after the publication of an investigation linking relatives of President Tokayev to a company awarded major government contracts.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-07-23 · extracted by language model

  • 日本で閲覧可能なウェブサイトがカザフスタンでは閲覧できないことがあります。

    Our translation: Websites that can be viewed in Japan may not be viewable in Kazakhstan.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Overseas travel safety information · observed 2026-10-16 · written for JPN nationals · extracted by language model

  • Следствие подозревают задержанного в том, что он «проникал на серверы иностранных компаний и устанавливал вредоносные программы, шифрующие компьютерные данные, а за восстановление данных требовал выкуп в криптовалюте».

    Our translation: The investigation suspects the detainee of having “penetrated the servers of foreign companies and installed malicious programs encrypting computer data, and demanded a ransom in cryptocurrency for restoring the data.”

    Vlast, via a site scoped search · observed 2025-07-26 · extracted by language model

  • Sadykova has also been subjected to phishing attempts and online harassment.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

1 excluded source
  • Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search, observed 2024-02-02: aged out after 3 years.

Encryption and VPN legality

Are VPNs and strong encryption lawful, and can I be required to install an application or hand over keys?

69High69 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

moderate confidence2 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 60% of full strength.

Why this score (2 sources)
  • Widespread restrictions. Regulations in Kazakhstan require every internet user in the country to install a backdoor, allowing the government to conduct surveillance and to intercept communications. This allows the government to access web browsing history, usernames and passwords, and even secure and HTTPS-encrypted traffic.

    Global Partners Digital, World Map of Encryption Laws and Policies · observed 2019-06-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored KAZ 1.63 of 4 on whether the government regulates the internet in a way consistent with international human rights standards, where higher is freer. This does not establish whether encryption or VPN use is lawful. It measures internet regulation in general, and is used as indirect evidence because the only survey that reads encryption law directly was published in 2019.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Surveillance and interception

How comprehensively are communications intercepted, retained, and monitored, and is commercial spyware in use?

69High69 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence4 independent sources

Why this score (7 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored KAZ 1 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored KAZ 1.54 of 4 on how comprehensively the government monitors social media and private online communication, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored KAZ 2.08 of 4 on how far privacy protection law shields communications from government access, where higher is freer. This measures what privacy law permits rather than what monitoring is practised, so it is read here as a constraint on interception rather than a measurement of it.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • The World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025 scored KAZ 0.28 of 1 on whether freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy is effectively guaranteed, a measure built from expert assessments of warrantless interception of communications.

    World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6 · observed 2025-01-01

  • The contractor was expected to flag “aggressive” and “strongly aggressive” content – particularly criticism of the government – and to compile monthly reports identifying specific authors, accounts, and platforms.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

  • Reports of extensive state monitoring of media and social media platforms aimed at identifying content critical of the authorities drew additional alarm, particularly as the president publicly endorsed efforts to scrutinise and locate users accused of spreading “disinformation” or “provocative” content.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

  • They would also require platforms to enforce a ban on the use of online platforms by persons under 16, except for messenger services, and to ensure that all account holders with more than 5,000 followers provide identification information to the authorities.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-01-27 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Connectivity continuity

How likely am I to lose access to the internet, or to the specific tools I depend on?

51High51 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence9 independent sources

Why this score (30 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

2 excluded sources
  • Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search, observed 2024-02-02: aged out after 3 years.
  • Eurasianet, via a site scoped search, observed 2022-01-08: aged out after 5 years.

Data jurisdiction

What happens to corporate or client data I carry into the jurisdiction?

48Caution48 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

moderate confidence1 independent source

Why this score (1 source)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Border device risk

How likely is my device to be searched, imaged, or seized at the border, and can I be compelled to unlock it?

27Caution27 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

good confidence5 independent sources

No reports were found of devices being searched, imaged or seized at this border, or of travellers being compelled to unlock them. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.

What the score rests on (5 indirect sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Trend

02550751002026-08-162026-10-16

The overall score is up 4.8 points over 61 days, from 55.7 to 60.5. Most movement is the event overlay decaying rather than anything happening: a news signal loses half its weight every three weeks, so a score drifts back toward its structural baseline on its own. A step that holds is the one worth reading.

Check this yourself

These are not inputs to the score for Kazakhstan. They are where to look if you want to test what is above against something we did not use.

Sources

This assessment draws on 16 sources: Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise; CIVICUS Monitor country updates; Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search; Freedom House, Freedom in the World; Freedom House, Freedom on the Net, obstacles to access; Georgia Tech Internet Intelligence Lab, Internet Outage Detection and Analysis; Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories; Global Partners Digital, World Map of Encryption Laws and Policies; International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Overseas travel safety information; Open Observatory of Network Interference, OONI measurement data; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice; US Department of State, Travel Advisories; V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project; Vlast, via a site scoped search; World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6. Every contributing claim is quoted with its origin and date above. Model version 0.12.0, computed 2026-10-16.

If something here is wrong, say so. Corrections are handled in public, and we correct because the evidence is wrong, not because someone objects.