WorldRisk

Which passport do you hold?

Risk to a traveller depends on their nationality. A country that sanctions your destination, or is sanctioned by it, changes how you are treated on arrival. Choosing here adjusts every score on the site.

We hold travel advice written for four nationalities so far. Selecting anything else shows the neutral baseline, and every page says so where it applies rather than presenting it as an assessment made for you.

Kept in your browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere, and you can change it at any time from the header.

All countries

Fiji

43Caution43 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49good confidence(7/7 dimensions)
What this score means
Extreme75 to 100
Severe and systematic. Device search, interception and detention over online activity are documented rather than theoretical. Reconsider what you carry and what you say.
High50 to 74
Substantial and consistently evidenced measures. Device inspection, monitored networks or restricted services should be expected rather than treated as unlikely.
Caution25 to 49
Some risk, and manageable with precautions. Measures are evidenced but are narrow, inconsistently applied, or the picture is mixed.
Low0 to 24
Ordinary precautions. No systematic device search, network restriction or prosecution of visitors for online speech is evidenced.

Government travel advice is written for one citizenry, so the same country carries a different assessment depending on your passport. Change it in the header.

Showing the baseline, which weights every issuer equally. No government in our corpus publishes travel advice written for you, so this is not addressed to you specifically.

Dimensions

Each dimension is scored independently, because the traveller who cares about legal exposure for what they have posted is often not the one carrying client data. Higher means more risk.

Speech and legal exposure

What legal risk attaches to what I have said online, or say while I am there?

69High69 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence9 independent sources

Why this score (17 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored FJI 3 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • Freedom House 2026 scored FJI 4 of 4 on free and independent media.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored FJI 3.13 of 4 on how routinely the government censors political content on social media, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored FJI 1.88 of 4 on how often people are arrested for political content they posted online, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • Fiji - Level 1: Exercise Normal Precautions

    US Department of State, Travel Advisories · observed 2024-12-02 · written for USA nationals

  • FCDO advice for Fiji: no advisory against travel in force.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2026-08-10 · written for GBR nationals

  • Fiji: Take normal security precautions

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-14 · written for CAN nationals

  • Fiji (Fidschi): No travel warning in force

    Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise · observed 2026-07-14 · written for DEU nationals

  • This law (current law) now criminalises that behaviour, meaning you can get charged and you can go to prison for it.

    Islands Business, via a site scoped search · observed 2026-07-13 · extracted by language model

  • In May 2026, police seized a phone belonging to an investigative journalist after she made a social media post about alleged corruption within the police force.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-11 · extracted by language model

  • Ongoing concerns include the Public Order (Amendment) Act, which has been used to restrict peaceful assembly and expression, and sedition provisions in the Crimes Act.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-11 · extracted by language model

  • Ongoing concerns include the Public Order (Amendment) Act, which has been used to restrict peaceful assembly and expression, and sedition provisions in the Crimes Act.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-04-09 · extracted by language model

  • It is alleged that between 2nd November 2025 and 14th December 2025, Charters intentionally aided and abetted a person who was at the material time an officer of the Fiji Independent Commission against Corruption at Suva to commit an offence under section 13G(1) of the FICAC Act 2007, namely the publication of official information relating to the functions of the Commission without the written permission of the Commissioner, by posting that official information on his Facebook account known as “Charlie Charters”.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-04-09 · extracted by language model

  • The Public Order Act has yet to be reviewed and continues to be used by authorities to restrict peaceful assembly and expression.

    Islands Business, via a site scoped search · observed 2024-12-06 · extracted by language model

  • Critics of the bill argue that the bill prohibits a number of campaigning activities during a referendum.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-04-09 · extracted by language model

  • As part of his bail conditions, Padarath is prohibited from using social media on any platform, either under his own name or any other alias.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-04-09 · extracted by language model

  • Fiji’s principal anti-corruption body, the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (Ficac), laid charges against Fijian and British national Charlie Charters, alleging two counts of aiding and abetting a whistleblower and the unlawful publication of official Commission information on Facebook between Nov 2 and Dec 14 last year.

    The National (Papua New Guinea), via a site scoped search · observed 2026-03-02 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Data jurisdiction

What happens to corporate or client data I carry into the jurisdiction?

62High62 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

moderate confidence2 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 52% of full strength.

Why this score (2 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Surveillance and interception

How comprehensively are communications intercepted, retained, and monitored, and is commercial spyware in use?

50High50 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence3 independent sources

Why this score (4 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored FJI 3 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored FJI 1.81 of 4 on how comprehensively the government monitors social media and private online communication, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored FJI 1.47 of 4 on how far privacy protection law shields communications from government access, where higher is freer. This measures what privacy law permits rather than what monitoring is practised, so it is read here as a constraint on interception rather than a measurement of it.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • But the FMA said several clauses, as drafted, could dilute the role of medical officers while giving Environmental Health Practitioners expanded authority over quarantine, isolation, surveillance, information gathering and enforcement.

    Islands Business, via a site scoped search · observed 2026-06-20 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Network threat

How hostile is the network environment to a foreign visitor, from state actors and criminals alike?

48Caution48 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

good confidence2 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 66% of full strength.

Why this score (2 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Encryption and VPN legality

Are VPNs and strong encryption lawful, and can I be required to install an application or hand over keys?

35Caution35 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

moderate confidence2 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 60% of full strength.

Why this score (2 sources)
  • Some restrictions. In Fiji, the law allows police officers or other authorised person(s) to apply for a search warrant for the purposes of a criminal investigation or criminal proceedings. The warrant can apply to either service providers for individuals, and can authorise the seizure of a specified computer system, program, data, or computer data storage medium. A warrant also grants the police officer or authorised person access to or assistance with such decryption information necessary to decrypt data. Failure to do so is a criminal offence punishable with a fine, imprisonment, or both. The law also requires

    Global Partners Digital, World Map of Encryption Laws and Policies · observed 2019-06-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored FJI 2.87 of 4 on whether the government regulates the internet in a way consistent with international human rights standards, where higher is freer. This does not establish whether encryption or VPN use is lawful. It measures internet regulation in general, and is used as indirect evidence because the only survey that reads encryption law directly was published in 2019.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Border device risk

How likely is my device to be searched, imaged, or seized at the border, and can I be compelled to unlock it?

23Low23 of 100, Low band, 0 to 24

good confidence5 independent sources

No reports were found of devices being searched, imaged or seized at this border, or of travellers being compelled to unlock them. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.

What the score rests on (5 indirect sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Connectivity continuity

How likely am I to lose access to the internet, or to the specific tools I depend on?

22Low22 of 100, Low band, 0 to 24

good confidence6 independent sources

Why this score (20 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Trend

02550751002026-08-162026-10-16

The overall score is up 3.7 points over 61 days, from 39.4 to 43.1. Most movement is the event overlay decaying rather than anything happening: a news signal loses half its weight every three weeks, so a score drifts back toward its structural baseline on its own. A step that holds is the one worth reading.

Check this yourself

These are not inputs to the score for Fiji. They are where to look if you want to test what is above against something we did not use.

Sources

This assessment draws on 13 sources: Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise; CIVICUS Monitor country updates; Cook Islands News, via a site scoped search; Freedom House, Freedom in the World; Georgia Tech Internet Intelligence Lab, Internet Outage Detection and Analysis; Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories; Global Partners Digital, World Map of Encryption Laws and Policies; International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index; Islands Business, via a site scoped search; The National (Papua New Guinea), via a site scoped search; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice; US Department of State, Travel Advisories; V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project. Every contributing claim is quoted with its origin and date above. Model version 0.12.0, computed 2026-10-16.

If something here is wrong, say so. Corrections are handled in public, and we correct because the evidence is wrong, not because someone objects.