WorldRisk

Which passport do you hold?

Risk to a traveller depends on their nationality. A country that sanctions your destination, or is sanctioned by it, changes how you are treated on arrival. Choosing here adjusts every score on the site.

We hold travel advice written for four nationalities so far. Selecting anything else shows the neutral baseline, and every page says so where it applies rather than presenting it as an assessment made for you.

Kept in your browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere, and you can change it at any time from the header.

All countries

Algeria

56High56 of 100, High band, 50 to 74good confidence(7/7 dimensions)
What this score means
Extreme75 to 100
Severe and systematic. Device search, interception and detention over online activity are documented rather than theoretical. Reconsider what you carry and what you say.
High50 to 74
Substantial and consistently evidenced measures. Device inspection, monitored networks or restricted services should be expected rather than treated as unlikely.
Caution25 to 49
Some risk, and manageable with precautions. Measures are evidenced but are narrow, inconsistently applied, or the picture is mixed.
Low0 to 24
Ordinary precautions. No systematic device search, network restriction or prosecution of visitors for online speech is evidenced.

Government travel advice is written for one citizenry, so the same country carries a different assessment depending on your passport. Change it in the header.

Showing the baseline, which weights every issuer equally. No government in our corpus publishes travel advice written for you, so this is not addressed to you specifically.

Dimensions

Each dimension is scored independently, because the traveller who cares about legal exposure for what they have posted is often not the one carrying client data. Higher means more risk.

Speech and legal exposure

What legal risk attaches to what I have said online, or say while I am there?

79Extreme79 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence9 independent sources

Why this score (19 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored DZA 1 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • Freedom House 2026 scored DZA 1 of 4 on free and independent media.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored DZA 2.28 of 4 on how routinely the government censors political content on social media, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored DZA 0.82 of 4 on how often people are arrested for political content they posted online, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • Algeria - Level 2: Exercise Increased Caution

    US Department of State, Travel Advisories · observed 2026-08-25 · written for USA nationals

  • FCDO advice for Algeria: avoid_all_travel_to_parts.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2026-09-25 · written for GBR nationals

  • Algeria: Exercise a high degree of caution

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-15 · written for CAN nationals

  • Algeria (Algerien): Teilreisewarnung: partial travel warning in force

    Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise · observed 2026-08-29 · written for DEU nationals

  • On 16th April 2026, Mohamed Arezki Saïd Chetouane, a figure associated with the Hirak movement, was sentenced by the Blida Criminal Court to seven years’ imprisonment on charges relating to “terrorism”, “insulting the president” and “publication detrimental to the national interest”.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-05-06 · extracted by language model

  • The new law introduces a permit system for founding newspapers and launching websites.

    SMEX, via a site scoped search · observed 2023-10-02 · extracted by language model

  • On 21st October 2025, the court of Hussein-Dey sentenced opposition leader Fethi Ghares to two years in prison, along with a fine of 300,000 dinars (about USD 3200), for allegedly “insulting the President of the Republic”, “insulting a constituted body” and “spreading false information likely to undermine public order and security”.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-28 · extracted by language model

  • On 21st October 2025, the Setif Court of Justice upheld the initial judgment against activist Hmimi Boudier handed down in April, sentencing him to six months of suspended imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 Algerian dinars (about 770 USD).

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-28 · extracted by language model

  • Tadjadit was arrested in January 2025 and sentenced to five years in prison under Articles 96, 79 and 146 of the Penal Code, in connection with his online writings and criticism of the government.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-05-06 · extracted by language model

  • According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, Mezghiche was arrested over posts on his Facebook page, reporting on public anger over the imprisonment of local figures in the southern city of Djanet.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-05-06 · extracted by language model

  • On 21st April 2026, Kabyle activist Wafia Tidjani was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment under Article 87 bis of the Criminal Code, on the basis of posts on Facebook.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-05-06 · extracted by language model

  • On 4th December 2025, the Bir Mourad Raïs court in Algiers sentenced journalist Saâd Bouakba to a three-year suspended prison sentence and a fine of one million dinars (about USD 7700) for "insulting and defaming" the "symbols of the National Liberation Revolution" and for "spreading false information" via information and communication technologies.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2025-12-17 · extracted by language model

  • He was prosecuted for posting content likely to harm national interests, under Article 96 of the Penal Code, and spreading misleading information that could undermine public order, under Article 196 bis of the Penal Code.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2025-12-17 · extracted by language model

  • Algerian authorities have imposed restrictions and censorship on the media ahead of the September presidential elections, where President Abdelmajid Tebboune is likely to seek another term, according to news reports and two local journalists who spoke with CPJ on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisal.

    Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search · observed 2024-07-05 · extracted by language model

  • On 5th January 2026, security services arrested four individuals, including three truck drivers, who had recorded a video documenting the movement.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-05-06 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

1 excluded source
  • Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search, observed 2019-07-01: aged out after 7 years.

Surveillance and interception

How comprehensively are communications intercepted, retained, and monitored, and is commercial spyware in use?

77Extreme77 of 100, Extreme band, 75 to 100

good confidence5 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 66% of full strength.

Why this score (7 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored DZA 1 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored DZA 0.80 of 4 on how comprehensively the government monitors social media and private online communication, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored DZA 2.04 of 4 on how far privacy protection law shields communications from government access, where higher is freer. This measures what privacy law permits rather than what monitoring is practised, so it is read here as a constraint on interception rather than a measurement of it.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • The World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025 scored DZA 0.42 of 1 on whether freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy is effectively guaranteed, a measure built from expert assessments of warrantless interception of communications.

    World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6 · observed 2025-01-01

  • The security services closely monitored social media, and the capital Algiers was put under heavy police surveillance.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-09-28 · extracted by language model

  • The security services closely monitored social media, and the capital Algiers was put under heavy police surveillance.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2025-12-17 · extracted by language model

  • According to the new Media Law, the powers of the Audiovisual Regulatory Authority now include “controlling and monitoring online audiovisual telecommunications services” and “ensuring professional journalism practices that strike a balance between freedom of the press and professional responsibility.”

    SMEX, via a site scoped search · observed 2023-10-02 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Data jurisdiction

What happens to corporate or client data I carry into the jurisdiction?

49Caution49 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

moderate confidence1 independent source

Why this score (1 source)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Connectivity continuity

How likely am I to lose access to the internet, or to the specific tools I depend on?

49Caution49 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

good confidence8 independent sources

Why this score (16 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Encryption and VPN legality

Are VPNs and strong encryption lawful, and can I be required to install an application or hand over keys?

47Caution47 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

low confidence2 independent sourcesEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 60% of full strength.

Why this score (2 sources)
  • Minimal restrictions. There are no bans on the use of strong encryption in Algeria, although the law does contain provisions allowing the government to decrypt encrypted data, including through hacking, subject to judicial authorisation. The law also requires that all electronic equipment, which can be interpreted to include encryption products, to be granted approval by the government prior to import.

    Global Partners Digital, World Map of Encryption Laws and Policies · observed 2019-06-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored DZA 1.19 of 4 on whether the government regulates the internet in a way consistent with international human rights standards, where higher is freer. This does not establish whether encryption or VPN use is lawful. It measures internet regulation in general, and is used as indirect evidence because the only survey that reads encryption law directly was published in 2019.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Border device risk

How likely is my device to be searched, imaged, or seized at the border, and can I be compelled to unlock it?

40Caution40 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

good confidence5 independent sources

No reports were found of devices being searched, imaged or seized at this border, or of travellers being compelled to unlock them. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.

What the score rests on (5 indirect sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Network threat

How hostile is the network environment to a foreign visitor, from state actors and criminals alike?

33Caution33 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

moderate confidence1 independent sourceEvidence is ageing: contributing sources are weighted at 66% of full strength.

No reports were found of attacks, interception or fraud aimed at visitors using networks here. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.

What the score rests on (1 indirect source)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Trend

02550751002026-08-162026-10-16

The overall score is up 4.0 points over 61 days, from 52 to 56. Most movement is the event overlay decaying rather than anything happening: a news signal loses half its weight every three weeks, so a score drifts back toward its structural baseline on its own. A step that holds is the one worth reading.

Check this yourself

These are not inputs to the score for Algeria. They are where to look if you want to test what is above against something we did not use.

Sources

This assessment draws on 14 sources: Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise; CIVICUS Monitor country updates; Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search; Freedom House, Freedom in the World; Georgia Tech Internet Intelligence Lab, Internet Outage Detection and Analysis; Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories; Global Partners Digital, World Map of Encryption Laws and Policies; International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index; Open Observatory of Network Interference, OONI measurement data; SMEX, via a site scoped search; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice; US Department of State, Travel Advisories; V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project; World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6. Every contributing claim is quoted with its origin and date above. Model version 0.12.0, computed 2026-10-16.

If something here is wrong, say so. Corrections are handled in public, and we correct because the evidence is wrong, not because someone objects.