WorldRisk

Which passport do you hold?

Risk to a traveller depends on their nationality. A country that sanctions your destination, or is sanctioned by it, changes how you are treated on arrival. Choosing here adjusts every score on the site.

We hold travel advice written for four nationalities so far. Selecting anything else shows the neutral baseline, and every page says so where it applies rather than presenting it as an assessment made for you.

Kept in your browser only. Nothing is sent anywhere, and you can change it at any time from the header.

All countries

Benin

45Caution45 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49good confidence(7/7 dimensions)
What this score means
Extreme75 to 100
Severe and systematic. Device search, interception and detention over online activity are documented rather than theoretical. Reconsider what you carry and what you say.
High50 to 74
Substantial and consistently evidenced measures. Device inspection, monitored networks or restricted services should be expected rather than treated as unlikely.
Caution25 to 49
Some risk, and manageable with precautions. Measures are evidenced but are narrow, inconsistently applied, or the picture is mixed.
Low0 to 24
Ordinary precautions. No systematic device search, network restriction or prosecution of visitors for online speech is evidenced.

Government travel advice is written for one citizenry, so the same country carries a different assessment depending on your passport. Change it in the header.

Showing the baseline, which weights every issuer equally. No government in our corpus publishes travel advice written for you, so this is not addressed to you specifically.

Dimensions

Each dimension is scored independently, because the traveller who cares about legal exposure for what they have posted is often not the one carrying client data. Higher means more risk.

Speech and legal exposure

What legal risk attaches to what I have said online, or say while I am there?

72High72 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence8 independent sources

Why this score (16 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored BEN 4 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • Freedom House 2026 scored BEN 2 of 4 on free and independent media.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored BEN 3.46 of 4 on how routinely the government censors political content on social media, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored BEN 1.39 of 4 on how often people are arrested for political content they posted online, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • Benin - Level 2: Exercise Increased Caution

    US Department of State, Travel Advisories · observed 2026-01-07 · written for USA nationals

  • FCDO advice for Benin: avoid_all_travel_to_parts, avoid_all_but_essential_travel_to_parts.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2025-12-15 · written for GBR nationals

  • Benin: Exercise a high degree of caution

    Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories · observed 2026-10-14 · written for CAN nationals

  • Benin: Teilreisewarnung: partial travel warning in force

    Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise · observed 2026-10-09 · written for DEU nationals

  • Since the adoption of the Digital Code in 2018—particularly Article 550 on the dissemination of false information—several journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens have been arrested or intimidated for their online speech.

    Paradigm Initiative, via a site scoped search · observed 2025-06-05 · extracted by language model

  • Le 16 décembre 2025, à Cotonou, les forces de sécurité ont arrêté Angela Kpeidja, journaliste et influenceuse, pour des commentaires qu’elle avait publiés sur Facebook au sujet de la tentative de coup d’État déjouée du 7 décembre 2025.

    Our translation: On 16 December 2025, in Cotonou, security forces arrested Angela Kpeidja, a journalist and influencer, for comments she had published on Facebook about the foiled coup attempt of 7 December 2025.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-04-03 · extracted by language model

  • The CSOs request electoral candidates’ commitment to revise restrictive laws, such as the Digital Code, which criminalises ‘publication of false information’ and ‘harassment through electronic communications’, to investigate security force excesses, end arbitrary detention, improve access to justice and promote gender equality, among other demands.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-03-31 · extracted by language model

  • He was accused of “publishing false news and harassment via electronic communication” in violation of the laws of the Digital Code.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2025-10-29 · extracted by language model

  • Les OSC demandent aux candidats aux élections de s’engager à réviser des lois restrictives, telles que le Code numérique, qui criminalise la « publication de fausses informations » et le « harcèlement par le biais de communications électroniques », à enquêter sur les excès commis par les forces de sécurité, à mettre fin aux détentions arbitraires, à améliorer l’accès à la justice et à favoriser l’égalité des sexes, entre autres.

    Our translation: Civil society organisations ask election candidates to commit to revising restrictive laws, such as the Digital Code, which criminalises the “publication of false information” and “harassment through electronic communications”, to investigate abuses committed by security forces, to end arbitrary detentions, to improve access to justice and to promote gender equality, among other things.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-04-03 · extracted by language model

  • On 3rd February 2026 Kingbo appeared before the CRIET, where she faced charges including electronic harassment, invasion of privacy, incitement to hatred and violence, and incitement to rebellion.

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-03-31 · extracted by language model

  • It is illegal to take photos at or near sensitive or government sites, such as military installations or the airport.

    UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice · observed 2025-12-15 · written for GBR nationals · extracted by language model

  • On 24th March 2026, the CRIET in Cotonou sentenced Pascal Mitowadé, a journalist working for the private daily newspaper La Tribune de la capitale, to five years in prison and a fine of 10 million CFA francs (approximately 17,200 USD).

    CIVICUS Monitor country updates · observed 2026-03-31 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

1 excluded source
  • Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search, observed 2023-09-07: aged out after 3 years.

Border device risk

How likely is my device to be searched, imaged, or seized at the border, and can I be compelled to unlock it?

55High55 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence6 independent sources

Why this score (7 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Network threat

How hostile is the network environment to a foreign visitor, from state actors and criminals alike?

54High54 of 100, High band, 50 to 74

good confidence3 independent sources

Why this score (4 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Connectivity continuity

How likely am I to lose access to the internet, or to the specific tools I depend on?

40Caution40 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

good confidence7 independent sources

Why this score (34 sources)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

1 excluded source
  • Paradigm Initiative, via a site scoped search, observed 2021-07-01: aged out after 5 years.

Surveillance and interception

How comprehensively are communications intercepted, retained, and monitored, and is commercial spyware in use?

36Caution36 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

moderate confidence4 independent sources

Why this score (5 sources)
  • Freedom House 2026 scored BEN 4 of 4 on freedom to express personal views on sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution.

    Freedom House, Freedom in the World · observed 2026-01-01

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored BEN 2.34 of 4 on how comprehensively the government monitors social media and private online communication, where higher is freer.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored BEN 3.66 of 4 on how far privacy protection law shields communications from government access, where higher is freer. This measures what privacy law permits rather than what monitoring is practised, so it is read here as a constraint on interception rather than a measurement of it.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

  • The World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2025 scored BEN 0.20 of 1 on whether freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy is effectively guaranteed, a measure built from expert assessments of warrantless interception of communications.

    World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6 · observed 2025-01-01

  • Despite the creation of the Data Protection Authority (APDP) in 2009, enforcement of data protection remains weak, and cases of non-judicial surveillance have been reported.

    Paradigm Initiative, via a site scoped search · observed 2025-06-05 · extracted by language model

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Encryption and VPN legality

Are VPNs and strong encryption lawful, and can I be required to install an application or hand over keys?

34Caution34 of 100, Caution band, 25 to 49

moderate confidence1 independent source

No law or enforcement action was found restricting the use of a VPN or strong encryption here. The score below is drawn from general indicators for this country rather than from anything observed about this risk, so it describes an absence of reports rather than evidence that the risk is absent.

What the score rests on (1 indirect source)
  • V-Dem Digital Society Project 2025 scored BEN 2.76 of 4 on whether the government regulates the internet in a way consistent with international human rights standards, where higher is freer. This does not establish whether encryption or VPN use is lawful. It measures internet regulation in general, and is used as indirect evidence because the only survey that reads encryption law directly was published in 2019.

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project · observed 2025-12-31

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Data jurisdiction

What happens to corporate or client data I carry into the jurisdiction?

15Low15 of 100, Low band, 0 to 24

moderate confidence1 independent source

Why this score (1 source)

Report an inaccuracy (corrections need a link to the reporting, statute or research that shows it).

Trend

02550751002026-08-162026-10-16

The overall score is up 11.2 points over 61 days, from 34.1 to 45.3. Most movement is the event overlay decaying rather than anything happening: a news signal loses half its weight every three weeks, so a score drifts back toward its structural baseline on its own. A step that holds is the one worth reading.

Check this yourself

These are not inputs to the score for Benin. They are where to look if you want to test what is above against something we did not use.

Sources

This assessment draws on 14 sources: Auswärtiges Amt, Reise- und Sicherheitshinweise; CIVICUS Monitor country updates; Committee to Protect Journalists, via a site scoped search; Freedom House, Freedom in the World; Georgia Tech Internet Intelligence Lab, Internet Outage Detection and Analysis; Global Affairs Canada, Travel advice and advisories; International Telecommunication Union, Global Cybersecurity Index; Open Observatory of Network Interference, OONI measurement data; Paradigm Initiative, via a site scoped search; Premium Times feed; UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Foreign travel advice; US Department of State, Travel Advisories; V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, Digital Society Project; World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index, sub-factor 4.6. Every contributing claim is quoted with its origin and date above. Model version 0.12.0, computed 2026-10-16.

If something here is wrong, say so. Corrections are handled in public, and we correct because the evidence is wrong, not because someone objects.